- Posts tagged iPhone
- Explore iPhone on posterous
Norway's largest paper: iPhone 4 Antennagate is a US problem
After testing Apple's iPhone 4 against competing HTC and Nokia models in a remote area on the edge of Norwegian carrier Telenor's mobile coverage, the county's largest paper has concluded that its antenna design is "just as good and bad as competitors," rather than suffering any defect.
The iPhone Antenna Song
Nokia pokes at iPhone 4 death grip, but people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
I'm not defending the iPhone 4's issues with reception when held in certain ways - I'm certainly hoping that the rumours of a firmware fix to improve matters are true. But Nokia may really have shot themselves in the foot by posting a blog on their official website mocking the iPhone 4. They say you can hold a Nokia any way you like; "you’re free to hold your Nokia device any way you like. And you won’t suffer any signal loss. Cool, huh?".
Yeah, that does sound pretty cool! So why is it that the E71 (the device pictured in their blog post) comes with instructions saying, "avoid touching the antenna area... [this] affects the communication quality". Hmmm... sound familiar? How about the scores of videos on YouTube showing exactly the same issues have existed with Nokias (and other phones) for years?
I'll re-iterate, I'm not saying the iPhone 4 is perfect, but seriously Nokia, people in glass houses should not throw stones!
The banned iPhone 4 promo video
Tee hee.
Twitter for iPhone: May Tweetie 2 Rest in Peace
![]()
Tweetie 3.0, or as Twitter would like you to call it, Twitter for iPhone is the worst software update I can ever remember downloading. Generally, updates make things better, not worse. Twitter for iPhone adds nothing useful to Tweetie’s base. It actually breaks Tweetie. And I feel fine calling it an “upgrade” because this “new” iPhone app overwrites your exisiting Tweetie 2. I can forgive poor design choices because the corporate overlords who bought your soul told you that you had to include their featured tweets and suggested users, but when you force your shiny new free turd on people and overwrite better software that they actually paid money for, you are taking your credibility and stomping all over it. Cause that’s what gets me more than anything. I’m going to run down some specific interface stuff that doesn’t benefit anyone but Twitter, but it’s this forced upgrade that kills me.
Full article here. It's a bit full on, but I totally agree... I want Tweetie back! Twitter for iPhone is worse than what came before, which is especially a shame as it's still better than anything else out there, meaning we're stuck with a worse selection of Twitter apps than we had a month ago. Boo!
One For The Geeks: Multitasking on iPhone 4.0 vs Android
There seems to be a bit of confusion about how multitasking works on the recently announced iPhone OS 4.0 in comparison to Android. This is an attempt to explain without getting too mired in the technical details.
Opera Mini for iPhone - Not just crap to use, but can't render pages properly either.
5 Things The iPhone Could Learn From The iPad

An interesting article on new features that the iPad has which Apple should bring to the iPhone. Very interesting that the iPad allows file synching in a USB Mass Storage style way, but whilst maintaining the application sandboxing of the iPhone. And the ability for the system to launch 3rd party applications to display certain file types (much like a PC/Mac does) is nice too. Seems like the iPad is shaping up to be an interesting device...
Update: More info from AppleInsider.
Anyone know of other apps with letter-based icons? Wondering if I can make an alphabet ;-)

O2 vs Vodafone: The Showdown (Part 3: Summary)
So I've explained why I moved from O2 to Vodafone, and we've seen that Vodafone is faster. But does that mean I made the right move? Well, there's more to a comparison than just speed. Here's some other notes...
Network Availability
Both O2 and Vodafone provide reasonable coverage within london. Frankly, I find both a little disappointing in that you can't reliably get 3G coverage even outdoors all over the capital. But I know planning permission for masts etc makes that tricky; the point is I don't see a big difference between the two. Vodafone is worse than O2 at holding a good connection in my work in West London, but better in our Surrey office. What is noticable is what happens when 3G isn't available. On the whole I'd say that Vodafone's 2G network seems to provide better coverage in more places but it's just that, 2G. There's almost no coverage of Edge, the "2.75G" network standard which is available on O2 in most places where 3G isn't present. I have to say I've found Vodafone's 2G speed to be pleasantly surprising, but it would be nicer to have Edge.




