Microsoft Admits Windows 7 Copies MacOS X (And that bears sometimes shit in woods)

One of the things that people say an awful lot about the Apple Mac is that the OS is fantastic, that it’s very graphical and easy to use. What we’ve tried to do with Windows 7 – whether it’s traditional format or in a touch format – is create a Mac look and feel in terms of graphics.

Interesting to see Microasoft's Simon Aldous admit this so explicitly in black and white. Yet while Windows 7 is a big step forward, I'm not sure they yet understand the relationship of "easy to use" and "graphical". Pretty doesn't automatically mean easy to use, Apple try (often successfully, though not always) to make their software meet both criteria. I often wonder if Microsoft think that making something pretty makes it easier to use.

(Also, don't get me started on him claiming that Vista is "far more stable than the current Mac platform". You're telling me Vista, the most derided OS in history, is more stable than a modern UNIX OS? I think both Mac fans and users of various other UNIX/Linux operating systems would love to challenge you on that.)

Comments (2)

Nov 11, 2009
djomp said...
Most of what brings Windows down is the 3rd party crap that gets loaded onto it. Perhaps if you took a vanilla install of Windows, didn't install anything else, didn't connect it to the internet... well, you'd have a very pretty desk ornament. But it'd probably be very stable.
Nov 11, 2009
dbkr said...
Some Mac/UNIX fans might love to challenge you on that, but not me. I've not really used Windows 7 much but my familiarity with the OS X kernel panic screen and Safari segfaults / complete GUI freezes or even just deciding it won't let me have my CD back means I think it's very possible Windows 7 is more stable - at least, as Rick says, before all the 3rd party software comes along.

Add a Comment

Meta